Friday, October 27, 2006

Neo-neocon on al-Dura verdict

Neo-neocon concludes that the judgement in the al-Dura case was not down to (or not just down to) political muscle, but to the French defamation laws which require that the defendant (Karsenty in this case) prove that the defamatory statement was true. Likely to be true is not good enough.

No comments: